Re: Undetctable Radar Detectors

From: Klaus Wilkens (klaus@buffnet.net)
Date: Sat Oct 03 1998 - 09:11:16 EDT


Jon brings up a good point about detecting a radar in back of you. as far as I
know the only detector which provides true 360 protection is the Valentine One.
It's the only detector out there with a front and rear antenna.

Also I'd research the detector and find a test to verify how undetectable it
really is I think C&D did a test and found some of the "undetectable " detectors
were quite detectable. (say that 3 time as fast as you can!)

KW

Jon Steiger wrote:

> At 11:41 PM 10/2/98 -0500, you wrote:
> >Most of the newest radar detectors do not emit the signal the trouper can
> >detect so I am getting one of the undetectable, remote mount units. I have a
> >perfect mounting for 97 and newer daks that "looks" right through the
> grill and
> >cannot be seen from outside the truck unless you raise the hood and even then
> >will not be recognized as a detector unless one really know what he is
> looking
> >for.
>
> Sounds pretty cool. Two things come to mind though... Make sure
> it is *really* undetectable before you fork over your cash, and also,
> having the sensor in the grille would leave you vulnerable to radar
> from behind. It might be worth it to buy another unit and point it
> behind you. (Though I have no idea where you'd mount something on the
> back of a truck; not too many locations to hide it!) Maybe you
> could disguise it as a hitch plug or a cargo light?
>
> -Jon-
>
> .--- stei0302@cs.fredonia.edu ------------------------------------.
> | Affiliations: DoD, EAA, MP Race Team, NMA, SPA, USUA. RP-SEL |
> | '96 Dodge Dakota v8 SLT CC (14.77@92.97), '96 Kolb FireFly 447 |
> `----------------------- http://www.cs.fredonia.edu/~stei0302/ ---'



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:10:32 EDT