Re: is: Scanner owners !total timing...was Re: Where Is Everyone From ?????

From: Bob Tom (tigers@bserv.com)
Date: Thu Oct 19 2000 - 16:07:49 EDT


At 12:33 PM 10/19/00 +0300, you wrote:
>Thanks! I suspected the 96 and earlier PCMs had more timing than the later
>perf units...Must verify! Im thinking my 98 truck is still missing a few
>degrees (19-20 deg @ WOT rock solid) Id like to see at least 25deg. How
>did the custom flash PCM effect your times? Bruce

I ran it twice during opening day at the track this year. I let the
tranny shift by itself and then did a manual shift run. Both runs gave
15.8x. This computer was also recalibrated for 5600 rpm shift points
(shifts were dead on on both runs). 60' times were 2.289 and 2.303.
1/8 times were 10.127 and 10.171. On the third run, I swapped in my
'96 MP PCM and promptly ran a 15.2x with lower manual shift points (~5000)
and had problems getting the 2-3 upshift. 60' time was 2.121 and 1/8 time
was 9.631

No more runs that day as it was free entry and every vehicle in Ontario
must have been there :-)

Bob

BTW, I also recorded the '97 MP PCM CA version (no fed version for the auto.).
Under WOT, spark advance ranged from 7 to 28 degrees advance. There is a
22 to 7 degree retard at the 1-2 shift and a 26 to 15 degrees retard at the
2-3 shift (for CA emission standards, I believe). Two runs with this computer
gave a 15.854 (auto. shift) and a 15.523 (manual shift). The third run
with the '96 MP PCM got me a 14.908.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 11:56:12 EDT